The widespread attention that the issue of men’s erectile dysfunction has received recently has generated interest in the sexuality of women. It has further created a competitive environment centered on the search for a female version of that magic blue pill called Viagra. lube that won’t burn vagina
However, the sexual problems that women contend with vary fundamentally from men’s and this factor is not being researched or critically looked into.
It is our belief that a basic obstacle that stands in the way of comprehending female sexuality is the medical categorization scheme that is currently being used. It was a development of the American Psychiatric Association, or APA, intended for the association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Disorders (DSM). This was undertaken in 1980 and the revised versions were published in 1987 and 1994. This particular scheme classifies the sexual problems of men and women into four sections in terms of sexual problems.
o Disorders of sexual desire.
o Disorders of sexual arousal.
o Disorders related to orgasms. o Disorders of sexual pain.
These disorders are an instability experienced in an unspoken response of sexual nature in the physical form, which is described as normal. This was initially outlined by Masters and Johnson in the late period of the 1960s. This widespread pattern theoretically starts with sexual desire and follows a sequence from desire to arousal and finally, orgasm.
Recently, the weakness of this framework in relation to women has been adequately acknowledged. Three of the gravest misrepresentations produced by this outline, which in essence diminishes sexual tribulations to that of physical functions, are the following.
1) An alleged concept of sexual equality between men and women.
As a result of the emphasis placed on similarities regarding the physiological responses of men and women to sex, the conclusion made was that the sexual disorders would naturally be the same. A small number of investigators took the time to enquire from women about the types of sexual disorders they were experiencing. These studies revealed that there are crucial differences between males and females.
The accounts of women cannot be accommodated by the Masters and Johnson standard. An example is that women do not make a distinction between arousal and desire. Women are less concerned with physical arousal in comparison to subjective arousal. The sexual complaints that women have emphasize on problems that are not included in the DSM.
Subsequently, the importance the physiological and genital similarities that males and females share leaves out the connotations of the inequalities presented by issues of gender, ethnicity, social class and sexual orientation among others. Economic, social and political situations, which include rampant sexually oriented violence, stand in the way of the access of women to reproductive health, sexual pleasure and fulfillment across the world. The social environments that women live in can adversely affect the indication of biological ability; this is a glaring reality that has been completely disregarded by the restrictive physiological idea of sexual dysfunctions.